Lifestyle Economics

The Case for a Lower Drink-Drive Limit is Weak


SUGGESTED

In the Media

Daniel Freeman writes for CapX

In the Media

IEA research featured in The Times

Christopher Snowdon writes for The Critic

IEA Head of Lifestyle Economics Christopher Snowdon has written for The Critic on proposals to lower the drink-drive limit to the equivalent of a small glass of wine or beer.

Christopher wrote:

“It goes without saying that driving drunk is an incredibly stupid and dangerous activity that kills around 260 people a year in Britain. Those who do it should be punished to the full extent of the law. Most countries accept that motorists can drink a small amount of alcohol and still be fit to drive. The only question is how much?

“Few people would argue that a motorist will be incapacitated by drinking such a modest amount of alcohol, but would there be benefits from lowering the limit?

“Fortunately, this is a question that can be answered with empirical evidence. In 2014, Scotland lowered the limit to 50mg of alcohol. What happened next has been evaluated in three peer-reviewed studies, one written by public health academics and two written by economists. They all found that lowering the limit had no impact on the number of road accidents, casualties or fatalities in Scotland.”

Read Christopher’s full piece here.



Newsletter Signup