Return of the Online Safety Bill “a crucial opportunity for parliamentarians to reconsider its most problematic elements.”
24 November 2022
SUGGESTED
In the Media
Prof. Len Shackleton writes in CapX
24 November 2022
In the Media
Christopher Snowdon quoted in City AM
25 November 2022
Uncategorized
20 January 2026
Commenting on the return of the Online Safety Bill to Parliament, Matthew Lesh, Head of Public Policy at the free market Institute of Economic Affairs said:
“The Online Safety Bill’s return provides a crucial opportunity for parliamentarians to reconsider its most problematic elements. The current Bill raises serious threats to freedom of expression, privacy, and innovation. Its return was expected but the devil will be in the detail of the government’s new amendments.
“The removal of duties in relation to ‘legal but harmful’ speech, as has been suggested, will be an important step in the right direction. But it is as important, if not more, to address other issues with the Bill.
“These include the mandating of automated monitoring and removal of user speech, while lowering the threshold for anything that platforms ‘reasonably infer’ could be illegal content. There are also serious privacy issues raised by the undermining of end-to-end encryption and age verification. That says nothing of the wide array of additional regulatory burdens that risk doing serious damage to Britain’s start-up sector.”
ENDS
Notes to editors
Contact: media@iea.org.uk / 07763 365520
IEA spokespeople are available for comment and interview.
“The Online Safety Bill’s return provides a crucial opportunity for parliamentarians to reconsider its most problematic elements. The current Bill raises serious threats to freedom of expression, privacy, and innovation. Its return was expected but the devil will be in the detail of the government’s new amendments.
“The removal of duties in relation to ‘legal but harmful’ speech, as has been suggested, will be an important step in the right direction. But it is as important, if not more, to address other issues with the Bill.
“These include the mandating of automated monitoring and removal of user speech, while lowering the threshold for anything that platforms ‘reasonably infer’ could be illegal content. There are also serious privacy issues raised by the undermining of end-to-end encryption and age verification. That says nothing of the wide array of additional regulatory burdens that risk doing serious damage to Britain’s start-up sector.”
ENDS
Notes to editors
Contact: media@iea.org.uk / 07763 365520
IEA spokespeople are available for comment and interview.
SHARE
