1 thought on “A reply to the British Medical Journal”

  1. Posted 20/06/2019 at 22:16 | Permalink

    >Owen Paterson is drawn into the web thanks to an £84 expenses bill paid by the IEA

    I am sorry Christopher, but the cat is now out of bag. If it had been £30-40 I might have said, “No, Owen Paterson cannot be bought for that much”. But £84 defintely tells us that you’ve bribed him. £80 would have been enough, but that extra £4 on top would be too much for any man. That’s even more than pint of beer at some pubs.

Leave a Reply

Your e-mail address will not be published.