A look at how cutting non-means-tested benefits and reforming state pensions could save £16bn a year

In Sharing the burden – How the older generation should suffer its share of the cuts the IEA looks at the savings that would be made if non-means-tested benefits to older people were cut and the state pension system were reformed.

Older people enjoy a privileged position at present. The non-means-tested benefits they receive have not been removed or reduced and the basic state pension is planned to increase above inflation. They also receive particularly favourable treatment in the tax system, with higher personal allowances than younger people and even a marriage allowance if one partner is over 75.

This group has received special treatment by the government in its spending review it has been left more or less exempt from spending cuts. At the same time younger people have felt the cuts through changes such as in tuition fees and child benefit. This paper shows how the government could save £16bn a year by cutting non-means-tested benefits to older people and reforming the state pension system.

2011, Discussion Paper 34

Fullscreen Mode