The Economic Case Against Colonialism
SUGGESTED
Andy Mayer quoted in The Telegraph
IEA research featured in The Times
The piece said:
“[Imperial Measurement: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Western Colonialism] is a fascinating exploration of the economics of colonialism, which, as Adam Smith pointed out as early as 1776, was of no great benefit to the British crown or its people: ‘Under the present system of management … Great Britain derives nothing but loss from the dominion which she assumes over her colonies’.
“Niemietz concludes that colonial trade contributed only a ‘small proportion’ of Britain’s economy — at its absolute zenith, between 7 and 15 per cent of our GDP — and that much of that trade might have occurred anyway without the imposition of British rule. Slavery was even less lucrative for the nation as a whole. At its peak, the income from our sugar plantations contributed no more than 2.5 per cent to the economy of the UK — substantially less than that accrued from sheep farming, as Niemietz points out.”
Read the full piece here.
Read a full copy of Imperial Measurement to learn more.