Pressing Matters: A summary of two papers on payments from platforms to publishers

Research

Pressing Matters: A summary of two papers on payments from platforms to publishers

Dr James Forder

5 May 2023

SUGGESTED

Economic Affairs

Housing vs farmland: how to get the balance right?

17 July 2024

https://iea.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Pressing-Matters-James-Forder-Briefing-paper-1-2.pdf

Download (PDF)

Summary

Technological development in recent decades has created serious challenges for the newspaper trade.

It has been claimed that some of the difficulty they face arises from exploiting market power by certain online platforms that allow users to post snippets of news from traditional publications without payment.

It has therefore been proposed that regulations be created which would have the effect of requiring such payment.

However, the best evidence contradicts the view that such market power exists. In fact, although the platforms certainly benefit from carrying the news snippets, the traditional publishers also benefit substantially and there is no good reason for additional payments to be made.

Mechanisms requiring such payments run a severe risk of disturbing the technological development and innovation process in the industry to the long-term harm of consumer interests.

In any case, abuses or market power, if they occur, should be dealt with by established competition law. The practice of designing custom-made regulations for particular sectors creates legal complexity and facilitates interest-specific lobbying.

Fullscreen Mode

James Forder

Dr James Forder was the Academic and Research Director at the IEA until January 2024. He has taught economics and sometimes politics at Oxford University since 1993 and is Andrew Graham Fellow and Tutor in Political Economy at Balliol College. His principal research interests have been in central bank independence, and the history of macroeconomics ideas, including especially those following from the work of A W H Phillips; and the work of Milton Friedman. He has also written on the merits of the first past the post electoral system. He believes that public policy could be enormously improved by greater recognition of the power and utility of price mechanisms, as compared to regulatory controls such as prohibitions, licensing rules, and obligations on public bodies to pursue specific quantitative outcomes.