Research

Prefunded pension systems: recent developments


SUGGESTED

Research

Reform of disability benefit system must be prioritised in face of an ageing population

Healthcare

Obesity costs less than half as much as the government claims

IEA releases report on the benefits of pre-funded pension systems

https://iea.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Briefing-Prefunded-Pension-Systems.pdf
Summary:

  • From the mid-1990s to the onset of the financial crisis, prefunded pension systems, based on individual retirement savings accounts, were spreading around the world. The UK was initially a world leader in this, due to the system of contracting out, which had allowed people to opt out of part of the state pension scheme and save for their own pension instead.

  • Since 2008, there has been a global U-turn. Private pension systems are now in retreat and the old-fashioned paternalistic welfare state is reasserting itself. The UK is no exception. The contracting-out system, which worked so well for over half a century, has now been ended.

  • Even in Chile, which has long been regarded as the ‘Mecca’ of private prefunded pensions, the mood has turned against that system. If even Chile has lost faith in privatisation and prefunding, what hope is there for an expansion of such systems elsewhere?

  • It is therefore necessary for international observers to interpret the Chilean experience correctly. However unpopular it may be at the moment, it remains the case that Chile’s private pension system has been a success story. It has provided consistently high rates of return and it has been an active ingredient in the country’s rapid economic development.

  • The reason why pensions in Chile have fallen behind expectations is insufficient savings, not any ‘failures’ of the system as such. Only one in three men, and one in four women, save regularly, and in addition, the contribution rate and the retirement age are set too low. The system offers decent pensions and excellent value for money to those who save regularly. But it cannot magically turn a record of sporadic savings into a comfortable old-age living standard – and nor could any other pension system.

  • Whatever problems the Chilean prefunded system may have, these are highly country-specific, and not applicable to the UK. In order to defuse the ‘demographic time bomb’, the UK would do well to reanimate its successful system of contracting out, and promote private pension savings.


Fullscreen Mode


Head of Political Economy

Dr Kristian Niemietz is the IEA's Editorial Director, and Head of Political Economy. Kristian studied Economics at the Humboldt Universität zu Berlin and the Universidad de Salamanca, graduating in 2007 as Diplom-Volkswirt (≈MSc in Economics). During his studies, he interned at the Central Bank of Bolivia (2004), the National Statistics Office of Paraguay (2005), and at the IEA (2006). He also studied Political Economy at King's College London, graduating in 2013 with a PhD. Kristian previously worked as a Research Fellow at the Berlin-based Institute for Free Enterprise (IUF), and taught Economics at King's College London. He is the author of the books "Socialism: The Failed Idea That Never Dies" (2019), "Universal Healthcare Without The NHS" (2016), "Redefining The Poverty Debate" (2012) and "A New Understanding of Poverty" (2011).



Newsletter Signup