Restructuring Minimum Wages

Research

Restructuring Minimum Wages

Professor Len Shackleton

3 September 2018

SUGGESTED

Research

The Mirage of Democratic Socialism

IEA publishes an alternative history of socialism

31 August 2018

Monetary Policy

SMPC votes Six / Three to Hold Bank Rate in September.

7 September 2018

latest

Trade, Development, and Immigration

Unplugging progress: the case against EV tariffs

4 November 2024

Complexity, compliance and a case for reform

https://iea.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/RESTRUCTURING-PAPER_WEB_SINGLES.pdf

Download (PDF)

Press release

Summary:

The National Minimum/Living Wage system has become too complicated, making unintentional non-compliance a problem, and is in danger of becoming a political football.

The Low Pay Commission should reject the Taylor Review proposal for new separate minima for workers on zero-hours contracts.

We should revert to having just two rates – one for 18-24 year-olds and one for those aged 25 and over. Those under 18 are now required to be in education and training and should not be treated as if they were full-time workers.

The ‘National Living Wage’ title is misleading, suggests that employers have responsibilities which belong to government, and should be dropped.

The Low Pay Commission has performed its duties well and should have its powers to recommend rates fully restored. Politicians should not be involved in a bidding war which could damage employment prospects for some groups of workers.

However it may be appropriate for the LPC to recommend different rates to the national governments/administrations and possibly also to the London mayor.

Rather than HMRC being paid to engage in ‘fishing expeditions’ to seek out non-compliance, employees should be incentivised to make their own claims by making fines payable as compensation to underpaid workers rather than going to the government.

Clearer and more comprehensive guidance on minimum wage regulations should be made available to employers and employees. The policy of ‘naming and shaming’ non-compliant employers should be confined to those intentionally or negligently underpaying.

Fullscreen Mode

Len Shackleton

Editorial and Research Fellow

Len Shackleton is an Editorial and Research Fellow at the IEA and Professor of Economics at the University of Buckingham. He was previously Dean of the Royal Docks Business School at the University of East London and prior to that was Dean of the Westminster Business School. He has also taught at Queen Mary, University of London and worked as an economist in the Civil Service. His research interests are primarily in the economics of labour markets. He has worked with many think tanks, most closely with the Institute of Economic Affairs, where he is an Economics Fellow. He edits the journal Economic Affairs, which is co-published by the IEA and the University of Buckingham.