Capital Controls: A ‘Cure’ Worse Than The Problem?
17 February 2004
SUGGESTED
Government and Institutions
8th IEA Discussion Paper
26 January 2004
Economic Theory
Richard A. Epstein explains how getting the 'easy questions' right may be more important than solving the 'hard questions'
1 March 2004
Government and Institutions
https://iea.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/upldbook135pdf.pdf
Free capital movements played an important part in the economic integration and globalisation of the nineteenth century. By the end of the century capital flows were on a remarkable scale.
The modern use of capital controls dates back to the 1930s. Professor Capie analyses historical experience with capital controls, in Britain and elsewhere, and reviews the theory. He concludes that such controls are damaging and that there is no case for reviving them, as some economists have suggested and as anti-globalisers would wish. Capital mobility improves the worldwide allocation of resources, channelling resources to their most productive uses. Controls on capital movements result in deadweight losses and bureaucratic costs. They are difficult to remove and they damage the credibility of the government’s commitment to a market economy.
2002, Research Monograph 56, ISBN 0 255 36506 3, 111pp, PB
The modern use of capital controls dates back to the 1930s. Professor Capie analyses historical experience with capital controls, in Britain and elsewhere, and reviews the theory. He concludes that such controls are damaging and that there is no case for reviving them, as some economists have suggested and as anti-globalisers would wish. Capital mobility improves the worldwide allocation of resources, channelling resources to their most productive uses. Controls on capital movements result in deadweight losses and bureaucratic costs. They are difficult to remove and they damage the credibility of the government’s commitment to a market economy.
2002, Research Monograph 56, ISBN 0 255 36506 3, 111pp, PB
SHARE
