IEA: Sugar tax “has not been a success”
20 September 2019
SUGGESTED
Lifestyle Economics
Christopher Snowdon responds to new research
19 September 2019
Government and Institutions
IEA responds to Shadow Chancellor's speech at Labour Party Conference
23 September 2019
Lifestyle Economics
15 November 2024
Commenting on figures showing an increase in sugar consumption in England, Christopher Snowdon, Head of Lifestyle Economics at the Institute of Economic Affairs, said:
“That sugar consumption has risen despite a concerted anti-sugar campaign, a sugar tax and a sugar reduction scheme shows that government policy has failed to change consumer behaviour, whilst putting financial strain on the lowest earners in Britain.
The sugar tax has not been a success. It has ruined a number of iconic soft drinks without having any effect on overall sugar consumption, let alone obesity. No doubt public health campaigners like Action on Sugar will double down and demand the sugar tax be extended to food.
That, too, will fail because people can choose to eat and drink what they want in a free country. The nanny state lobby’s solution is to stop Britain being a free country, and that is why they must be resisted.”
Notes to editors:
For media enquiries please contact Emma Revell, Communications Manager: 07931 698 246
For further IEA reading on sugar taxes, click here.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems.
The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties
“That sugar consumption has risen despite a concerted anti-sugar campaign, a sugar tax and a sugar reduction scheme shows that government policy has failed to change consumer behaviour, whilst putting financial strain on the lowest earners in Britain.
The sugar tax has not been a success. It has ruined a number of iconic soft drinks without having any effect on overall sugar consumption, let alone obesity. No doubt public health campaigners like Action on Sugar will double down and demand the sugar tax be extended to food.
That, too, will fail because people can choose to eat and drink what they want in a free country. The nanny state lobby’s solution is to stop Britain being a free country, and that is why they must be resisted.”
Notes to editors:
For media enquiries please contact Emma Revell, Communications Manager: 07931 698 246
For further IEA reading on sugar taxes, click here.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems.
The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties
SHARE
