Debanking Burden Falls Disproportionately on Charities
SUGGESTED
Andy Mayer quoted in Third Sector
Andy said:
“A charitable company limited by guarantee does not have shares, any assets are held in trust not owned by individuals, and with a sufficiently diversified board or membership structure, it lacks anything akin to ‘ultimate beneficial ownership’, which is normal for private companies.
“Politely pointing this out in turn can yield a suspicion that the charity is concealing something, which in turn can lead to enhanced checks.
“In summary, the reversal of the burden of proof – that charities must repetitively prove they are not fronts for criminal behaviour rather than respond to requests based on reasonable suspicion – coupled with enforcement by bank clerks with no expertise in either financial crime, charity or company law is creating a costly mess that risks the survival of any charity failing to tick every box accurately, every time.”
Read the full article here.
Read a full copy of Debanked: The economic and social consequences of anti-money laundering regulation.