Pensions legislation risks bankrupting British industry
13 December 2006
SUGGESTED
Press Release
An IEA monograph reveals the negative economic impact of current taxation levels
17 November 2006
Monetary Policy
SMPC votes seven to two for an increase in interest rates
5 November 2006
Transport
An IEA study reveals the magnitude of private sector pension debt
In a new study*, published today by the IEA, actuary Nick Silver** estimates that the total deficit of final salary private pension schemes is nearly £500bn on a buyout basis (compared with £124bn on standard accounting bases). This is the basis relevant if companies cease trading or wind up their scheme. If they were to do so, most companies would be faced with an immediate liability much larger than the value of the assets in the scheme, which, in some cases, would often be larger than the value of the company as well. The potential debt is highly concentrated amongst a small number of companies.
The study also finds that, through short-sighted legislation, successive governments have added to the cost of final salary pension schemes, making them unattractive to employers and hastening their closure. In short, “the pursuit of the perfect has been the enemy of the good.”
The introduction of the Pension Protection Fund will also increase the cost of final salary schemes and may introduce a moral hazard for employers. Nick Silver comments, “If there is a serious economic down-turn a lot of companies could go under at the same time. These calculations show the extent of the deficits that would be revealed in some schemes were this to happen. It could put enormous pressure on the Pension Protection Fund. Ultimately the government or the tax payer may have to meet the bill.”
Nick Silver suggests a number of ways to reduce the burden of schemes and improve members’ security:
• Legislation which has had unintended consequences, such as statutory indexation and forcing buy-outs on closed schemes, should be repealed.
• Schemes should be allowed to change their structure so that trustees’ incentives are better aligned with those of scheme members.
• Market-based solutions such as tradable pension debt and debt/equity swaps should be encouraged.
*The trouble with final salary pension schemes by Nick Silver, 14th IEA Discussion Paper, The Institute of Economic Affairs.
** Nick Silver is a director of Silver Actuarial Services and is the lead consultant on the IEA Empowerment Through Savings project, sponsored by the Templeton Foundation.
The study also finds that, through short-sighted legislation, successive governments have added to the cost of final salary pension schemes, making them unattractive to employers and hastening their closure. In short, “the pursuit of the perfect has been the enemy of the good.”
The introduction of the Pension Protection Fund will also increase the cost of final salary schemes and may introduce a moral hazard for employers. Nick Silver comments, “If there is a serious economic down-turn a lot of companies could go under at the same time. These calculations show the extent of the deficits that would be revealed in some schemes were this to happen. It could put enormous pressure on the Pension Protection Fund. Ultimately the government or the tax payer may have to meet the bill.”
Nick Silver suggests a number of ways to reduce the burden of schemes and improve members’ security:
• Legislation which has had unintended consequences, such as statutory indexation and forcing buy-outs on closed schemes, should be repealed.
• Schemes should be allowed to change their structure so that trustees’ incentives are better aligned with those of scheme members.
• Market-based solutions such as tradable pension debt and debt/equity swaps should be encouraged.
*The trouble with final salary pension schemes by Nick Silver, 14th IEA Discussion Paper, The Institute of Economic Affairs.
** Nick Silver is a director of Silver Actuarial Services and is the lead consultant on the IEA Empowerment Through Savings project, sponsored by the Templeton Foundation.
SHARE
