Ed Balls fails to set out plan for growth
23 September 2013
SUGGESTED
Economic Theory
Mark Littlewood discusses a stronger economy for the UK
20 September 2013
Housing and Planning
Tinkering policies will do little for families struggling to make ends meet
24 September 2013
Economic Theory
11 November 2024
IEA response to Shadow Chancellor's speech to Labour Conference
Commenting on Ed Balls’ economic plans in his speech to Labour Conference, Professor Philip Booth, Editorial and Programme Director at the Institute of Economic Affairs, said:
1. Bank levy
“The Labour Party seems to view the banking sector as a cash cow. Increasing the banking levy for the purpose of funding new spending commitments will reduce bank lending to both businesses and households. This could severely damage the economy.
“Ed Balls has forgotten the purpose of the banking levy: it was designed to compensate taxpayers for costs imposed on government when banks fail. It should be temporary and not be used to finance new spending programmes.”
2. Childcare
“Labour’s approach to childcare seems to be to push up both costs and subsidies. Rather than increasing taxes to help certain types of families, Ed Balls should look to reduce regulation – including planning regulation – to bring down the cost of childcare rather than calling for yet more taxpayer support.”
3. HS2
“It is good the Labour Party are finally recognising that HS2 represents enormously poor value for money. Ed Balls should commit to scrapping this loss-making project.
“Tens of billions of pounds would be better used to reduce taxes to ease the burden of rising living costs for families nationwide.”
Notes to editors:
To arrange an interview with an IEA spokesperson please contact Stephanie Lis, Communications Officer: 07766 221 268, slis@iea.org.uk
In August 2013, the IEA published The High-Speed Gravy Train: Special Interests, Transport Policy and Government Spending. The research showed that HS2 could end up costing taxpayers £80bn, double the current estimate.
In December 2012 the IEA published Redefining the Poverty Debate – Why a War on Markets is No Substitute for a War on Poverty. Chapter Four addresses childcare costs.
In July 2011 the IEA published Sharper Axes, Lower Taxes – Big Steps to a Smaller State. Chapter Five looked at how increasing regulation of the childcare sector has driven up costs.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems.
The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
1. Bank levy
“The Labour Party seems to view the banking sector as a cash cow. Increasing the banking levy for the purpose of funding new spending commitments will reduce bank lending to both businesses and households. This could severely damage the economy.
“Ed Balls has forgotten the purpose of the banking levy: it was designed to compensate taxpayers for costs imposed on government when banks fail. It should be temporary and not be used to finance new spending programmes.”
2. Childcare
“Labour’s approach to childcare seems to be to push up both costs and subsidies. Rather than increasing taxes to help certain types of families, Ed Balls should look to reduce regulation – including planning regulation – to bring down the cost of childcare rather than calling for yet more taxpayer support.”
3. HS2
“It is good the Labour Party are finally recognising that HS2 represents enormously poor value for money. Ed Balls should commit to scrapping this loss-making project.
“Tens of billions of pounds would be better used to reduce taxes to ease the burden of rising living costs for families nationwide.”
Notes to editors:
To arrange an interview with an IEA spokesperson please contact Stephanie Lis, Communications Officer: 07766 221 268, slis@iea.org.uk
In August 2013, the IEA published The High-Speed Gravy Train: Special Interests, Transport Policy and Government Spending. The research showed that HS2 could end up costing taxpayers £80bn, double the current estimate.
In December 2012 the IEA published Redefining the Poverty Debate – Why a War on Markets is No Substitute for a War on Poverty. Chapter Four addresses childcare costs.
In July 2011 the IEA published Sharper Axes, Lower Taxes – Big Steps to a Smaller State. Chapter Five looked at how increasing regulation of the childcare sector has driven up costs.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems.
The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
SHARE
