Bank levy ill-conceived and damaging
8 February 2011
SUGGESTED
Press Release
7 February 2011
Press Release
Mark Littlewood comments on the Prime Minister's latest proposals
14 February 2011
Tax and Fiscal Policy
19 November 2024
Prof Philip Booth comments on the government's latest proposals
Commenting on Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne’s announcement today that the bank levy is to be increased with immediate effect, Prof Philip Booth, Editorial and Programme Director at the Institute of Economic Affairs, said:
“Increasing and extending this levy at this time is clearly a political decision – but it is bad economics. Financial services are something this country has successfully specialised in – it is something we are good at – and further seeking to penalise it for political gain is dangerous.
“The government has set up the Independent Commission on Banking for the purpose of creating mechanisms whereby banks can fail in an orderly fashion, without bringing the whole system down and requiring taxpayer bailout. Yet this increased levy is supposedly being imposed in order to contribute towards a potential future bailout – the very thing these mechanisms will guard against. The government’s policy on this is completely incoherent.
“The government would do better focusing its efforts towards cutting regulation and red tape, and allowing growth to return to the economy, rather than creating further uncertainty in the banking and financial services industries.”
NOTES TO EDITORS
To arrange an interview with Prof Philip Booth, IEA Editorial and Programme Director, please contact Stephanie Lis, Communications Officer, 020 7799 8909, slis@iea.org.uk.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems. The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
“Increasing and extending this levy at this time is clearly a political decision – but it is bad economics. Financial services are something this country has successfully specialised in – it is something we are good at – and further seeking to penalise it for political gain is dangerous.
“The government has set up the Independent Commission on Banking for the purpose of creating mechanisms whereby banks can fail in an orderly fashion, without bringing the whole system down and requiring taxpayer bailout. Yet this increased levy is supposedly being imposed in order to contribute towards a potential future bailout – the very thing these mechanisms will guard against. The government’s policy on this is completely incoherent.
“The government would do better focusing its efforts towards cutting regulation and red tape, and allowing growth to return to the economy, rather than creating further uncertainty in the banking and financial services industries.”
NOTES TO EDITORS
To arrange an interview with Prof Philip Booth, IEA Editorial and Programme Director, please contact Stephanie Lis, Communications Officer, 020 7799 8909, slis@iea.org.uk.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems. The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
SHARE
