Why regulation fails: Baby P and Northern Rock
18 November 2008
SUGGESTED
Economic Theory
Housing and Planning
21 November 2008
Transport
Without wishing to trivialise the former, there are eerie similarities between the tragic case of Baby P and the failure of Northern Rock. In the banking sector, the FSA, which has virtually unlimited regulatory powers, uses extraordinarily detailed rulebooks in order to seek the needle of abuse in the great haystack of financial transactions. Meanwhile, the obvious was missed and nobody understood how to use relevant powers to achieve important objectives at the crucial time. In the case of Baby P, the Every Child Matters agenda has everybody monitoring everybody else looking for the needle of minor mistreatment in the great haystack of child-adult relationships. Once again the obvious is missed and the authorities are paralysed by indecision at the very point when they should take some action.
In both cases, in various ways, the free institutions of civil society, which should have primary responsibility in monitoring economic and social relationships, have become subservient to statutory authorities whose attempts at perfecting society and the economy through ever-more detailed regulation are failing disastrously. Indeed, this is a basic Hayekian situation. The knowledge that is needed to regulate private behaviour is naturally dispersed and cannot be centralised in regulatory institutions that lie outside the market and civil society. If the state stuck to dealing with criminal behaviour it might make a better fist of it.
In both cases, in various ways, the free institutions of civil society, which should have primary responsibility in monitoring economic and social relationships, have become subservient to statutory authorities whose attempts at perfecting society and the economy through ever-more detailed regulation are failing disastrously. Indeed, this is a basic Hayekian situation. The knowledge that is needed to regulate private behaviour is naturally dispersed and cannot be centralised in regulatory institutions that lie outside the market and civil society. If the state stuck to dealing with criminal behaviour it might make a better fist of it.
4 thoughts on “Why regulation fails: Baby P and Northern Rock”
Comments are closed.
SHARE
As a Hayek disciple I hate centralisation. But is the self-discipline of individual players in the market, ensured by fear of bankruptcy, enough to remove any need for central regulation , not only by governmental bodies, but even by the financial services industry? Peter Booth needs to expand on his comment.
As a Hayek disciple I hate centralisation. But is the self-discipline of individual players in the market, ensured by fear of bankruptcy, enough to remove any need for central regulation , not only by governmental bodies, but even by the financial services industry? Peter Booth needs to expand on his comment.
I was not making the case for no regulation here. But detailed regulation of investment transactions etc should be returned to the market (Exchanges etc). Given our current monetary system, there is a role for regulation of banks but it should focus on the systemic risk to the payments system. This is the price banks pay for access to lender of last resort facilities. You could have unregulated banks completely outside that system. That would be very liberal compared with the current position.
I was not making the case for no regulation here. But detailed regulation of investment transactions etc should be returned to the market (Exchanges etc). Given our current monetary system, there is a role for regulation of banks but it should focus on the systemic risk to the payments system. This is the price banks pay for access to lender of last resort facilities. You could have unregulated banks completely outside that system. That would be very liberal compared with the current position.