Taxpayers will pay the price for EU hedge fund vendetta

You might have thought that, with the Eurozone in turmoil, the EU would have no time to pursue its vendetta against hedge funds. Far from it, the latest proposals are even more wide-ranging than most observers anticipated. They involve the establishment of a Europe-wide regulatory authority with the power (presumably) to dictate to the FSA how to police the UK’s financial sector, restricting the ability of hedge funds based outside Europe to sell inside Europe and making it hard for European investors to invest in the rest of the world’s alternative investment vehicles. Although the regulations are aimed squarely at the predominance of London as a financial centre, the collateral damage will threaten every investor, pension fund contributor or life insurance buyer, and ultimately every taxpayer in Europe.

As such, the proposals represent a major expansion of the power of the EU’s unelected and unaccountable bureaucracy and a commensurate reduction in the freedom of European investors, whether institutional or private. It is dispiriting to see how casually the EU can limit the right of investors to choose how and where to allocate their own funds. As far as the restrictions preventing hedge funds from basing themselves wherever the tax and regulatory regime are most amenable, the net outcome is likely to be an alternative investment industry shorn of its hundreds of small funds and instead dominated by a handful of Too Big To Fail behemoths.

The truth bears repeating. Much as commentators and (especially) politicians pointed to the hedge funds as an accident waiting to happen, when the subprime storm actually arrived, its epicentre was in the mainstream banks, not the so-called alternative investment sector. The big problems were squarely located in the large investment banks in the USA – notably Lehman and Bear Stearns – and in those UK high-street banks which had been behaving like investment banks. In fact, some of the earliest signs of trouble appeared in Germany’s own regional savings banks which had been behaving with all the recklessness of an old maid at an all-night rave, with predictable results.

Nor can the hedge funds be said to have played a major role in the Euro’s crisis. The Greek bailout is unavoidable because of the implications of default for the major European commercial banks – in other words, it is a bank bailout in all but name. The hedge funds played no part in creating Greece’s budget deficit nor in concealing its true scale. Their only contribution (if any) was in announcing through the credit default swaps market that Greece was insolvent. The EU’s vindictiveness is explained by the fact that, although the hedge funds are only bit-part players, their walk-on role often involves delivering bad news – hence the short-selling restrictions following only hours after the publication of the hedge funds proposals. The knee-jerk response of populist politicians to shoot the messenger is deplorably immature.

2 thoughts on “Taxpayers will pay the price for EU hedge fund vendetta”

  1. Posted 24/05/2010 at 15:46 | Permalink

    I am being simplistic here but the major difference between state and private sectors is sheer choice. On pension provision I have to opt into the government pension for not a lot when I retire or go to a private pension company for real money to retire on. If my fund manager is reckless in their choice of funds I can take my business elsewhere. Ergo if I do not want to invest in a hedge fund I can decline directly or with a pension fund insist my money is invested for example in equities, fixed income bonds or cash funds.

    This seems a deliberate ploy to undermine the City of London and British commerce.

  2. Posted 24/05/2010 at 21:05 | Permalink

    Not only that, Dave, hedge funds are only used by wealthy investors or non-retail investors. That is why they are hitherto unregulated – uninformed customers cannot really get anywhere near them. There is no case for this regulation at all.

Comments are closed.