2 thoughts on “Political football?”

  1. Posted 12/05/2009 at 13:01 | Permalink

    Very interesting. Also pertinent is that at least two (if not three) of the big four essentially survive on their own resources. One of them (Chelsea) does not. Other teams that have had huge injections of funds have not been successful but there has always been the opportunity for them to join the big four. So, perhaps the fact that the big four is so stable is indicative of them being so well run.

  2. Posted 12/05/2009 at 13:01 | Permalink

    Very interesting. Also pertinent is that at least two (if not three) of the big four essentially survive on their own resources. One of them (Chelsea) does not. Other teams that have had huge injections of funds have not been successful but there has always been the opportunity for them to join the big four. So, perhaps the fact that the big four is so stable is indicative of them being so well run.

Comments are closed.