Harriet Harman, property rights and the rule of law
SUGGESTED
If property rights – which include, of course, pension entitlements – were to be determined by “the court of public opinion” the results would be economically catastrophic. Resources would be diverted to those deemed morally worthy, or able to capture the political process, rather than to enterprises that would put them to their most productive use. Distortion of the market process by attempting to deliberately assign income and wealth always results in impoverishment – thus always proving counter-productive. Sadly, there is no shortage of examples of societies that have met such a fate. The Soviet Union and its Eastern European satellites are one example from recent history. Zimbabwe offers a contemporary case.
2 thoughts on “Harriet Harman, property rights and the rule of law”
Comments are closed.
But don’t these sorts of statements backfire on politicians? Harriet Harman is now in the difficult position of having to back up her statement without the wherewithal to do so. It is more of a statement of the government’s ineffectuality and unpopularity that she has to rely on ‘public opinion’ rather than the authority of government office.
But don’t these sorts of statements backfire on politicians? Harriet Harman is now in the difficult position of having to back up her statement without the wherewithal to do so. It is more of a statement of the government’s ineffectuality and unpopularity that she has to rely on ‘public opinion’ rather than the authority of government office.