The drug policy of the UK has, for years, taken the line of being ‘hard on drugs’, aiming to stamp out use and drug related crime through ever tougher laws and regulations. It means that simply for possessing a class B drug such as cannabis, a person can be sent to prison for up to 5 years. For a Class A drug like ecstasy this is 7 years and intent to supply could lead to life imprisonment.
1 thought on “Can Britain learn from Portugal’s liberalised drug laws?”
The main reasons given for wanting a more “liberal” drugs policy are that “prohibition has failed” and that “the war on drugs has been lost”.
But liberal means “freedom of choice as long as one man’s choice does not interfere with another man’s freedom”, and it is quite clear that drug usage very definitely interferes with other peoples’ lives in many different and significant ways.
Furthermore, the so-called war on drugs has never even started. 70 to 75% of addicts have oft tried to quit and just as often failed, yet still want to quit. But it is not the suppliers being fought by the authorities who are to blame.
It is not supply which continues addiction. It is demand. And “the war on drugs” will start on the day we concentrate on DEMAND REDUCTION. Which simply means reducing the number of addicts.
BUT, this does not mean continuing to “treat” addicts with other drugs for life. It means “training” them to achieve their goal of getting themselves off drugs, and for 46 years this has been done with 169 Addiction
Recovery Training Centres now delivering in 49 countries.
Regrettably, because self-help recovery does not utilise psychiatric or pharmaceutical practitioners, it is constantly attacked and suppressed by those same vested interests. Yet “do-it-for-yourself2 is the only true liberalisation and the only certain escape from addiction and all that goes with it whether “illegal” or “legalised.
Comments are closed.
XWe use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent. Read More REJECTCookie settings ACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
The main reasons given for wanting a more “liberal” drugs policy are that “prohibition has failed” and that “the war on drugs has been lost”.
But liberal means “freedom of choice as long as one man’s choice does not interfere with another man’s freedom”, and it is quite clear that drug usage very definitely interferes with other peoples’ lives in many different and significant ways.
Furthermore, the so-called war on drugs has never even started. 70 to 75% of addicts have oft tried to quit and just as often failed, yet still want to quit. But it is not the suppliers being fought by the authorities who are to blame.
It is not supply which continues addiction. It is demand. And “the war on drugs” will start on the day we concentrate on DEMAND REDUCTION. Which simply means reducing the number of addicts.
BUT, this does not mean continuing to “treat” addicts with other drugs for life. It means “training” them to achieve their goal of getting themselves off drugs, and for 46 years this has been done with 169 Addiction
Recovery Training Centres now delivering in 49 countries.
Regrettably, because self-help recovery does not utilise psychiatric or pharmaceutical practitioners, it is constantly attacked and suppressed by those same vested interests. Yet “do-it-for-yourself2 is the only true liberalisation and the only certain escape from addiction and all that goes with it whether “illegal” or “legalised.