50 years from Beeching – rail subsidies remain too high
26 March 2013
SUGGESTED
Press Release
IEA reaction to the Chancellor's 2013 Budget
20 March 2013
Press Release
Swathes of complex capital regulation have made banking riskier
27 March 2013
Housing and Planning
Current high level of taxpayer support for railways is unacceptable
Commenting on the 50th anniversary of the publication of the Beeching Report, Dr Richard Wellings, Head of Transport at the Institute of Economic Affairs said:
“Despite the cuts made by Dr Beeching, the railways remain a massive burden on the taxpayer. Subsidies now run at £6 billion a year, almost three times the level (in real terms) when Beeching published his famous report. Just as in 1963, large parts of the rail network make very heavy losses. On some rural services, fare revenues only cover a tenth of running costs.
“The current high level of taxpayer support for the railways is completely unacceptable and imposes significant damage on the wider economy. However, another round of centrally-planned Beeching-style cuts is not the best way to bring subsidies down. Instead, rail firms should be given the freedom to decide which services and routes are commercially viable, in the context of a gradual phasing out of financial support from the government.”
Notes to editors
To arrange an interview with an IEA spokesperson, please contact Stephanie Lis, Communications Officer: 0207 799 8900 or 07766 221 268.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems.
The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
“Despite the cuts made by Dr Beeching, the railways remain a massive burden on the taxpayer. Subsidies now run at £6 billion a year, almost three times the level (in real terms) when Beeching published his famous report. Just as in 1963, large parts of the rail network make very heavy losses. On some rural services, fare revenues only cover a tenth of running costs.
“The current high level of taxpayer support for the railways is completely unacceptable and imposes significant damage on the wider economy. However, another round of centrally-planned Beeching-style cuts is not the best way to bring subsidies down. Instead, rail firms should be given the freedom to decide which services and routes are commercially viable, in the context of a gradual phasing out of financial support from the government.”
Notes to editors
To arrange an interview with an IEA spokesperson, please contact Stephanie Lis, Communications Officer: 0207 799 8900 or 07766 221 268.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems.
The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
SHARE
