Skip to content
Institute of Economic Affairs

Institute of Economic Affairs

Institute of Economic Affairs

Sunday January 17, 2021
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • rss
  • Institute of Economic Affairs
  • Home
  • About
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Epicenter
  • Contact Us
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • rss
  • Blog
  • Film
  • Coronavirus
  • Research
    • Publications
    • Economic Affairs
    • EA Magazine
    • Brexit Unit
    • Int. Trade & Competition Unit
    • SMPC
    • Paragon Initiative
  • Media
    • Media Coverage
    • Press Releases
    • Media Enquiries
    • About IEA Comms
  • Students
    • Internships
    • Events and Conferences
    • Essay Competition
    • Student Resources
    • IEA Budget Challenge
  • Events
    • Forthcoming Events
    • Past Events
  • Donate
    • Donate Now
    • Donate Monthly
    • Donate to IEA Projects
    • Other Ways to Donate
    • Legacy Gift
    • Donate from USA
    • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Epicenter
  • Contact Us

“Very unlikely” current welfare system will survive the Covid-19 pandemic, says new IEA briefing

26 May 2020
Institute of Economic Affairs > Media posts > Media > Press Release
Coronavirus will bring to a head discontent with the welfare system and strengthen support for a Universal Basic Income, says Dr Stephen Davies in a new briefing paper

  • Major crises have often triggered radical reconstruction of the welfare system;

  • It is very likely that the Covid-19 pandemic will amplify discontent that has been growing for some time;

  • The sharp rise in unemployment and fall in income for many will lay bare its weaknesses, particularly over Universal Credit;

  • It will likely strengthen support for moving to a Guaranteed Minimum Income – a variant of which is a Universal Basic Income (UBI);

  • A consensus could form around UBI because it has supporters across the ideological spectrum;

  • But moving to a UBI raises questions not just of cost but about the way we live: the place of the home and household, the importance of work, and the role of civil society;

  • Further, for the moment, any universal payment will fall at the first fence because the government does not have a list of all legal residents in the country;

  • The current pandemic was a crisis foretold, with many warnings over the last decade that something like this was bound to happen eventually. We cannot – and should not – think of this as a once in a century event;

  • It is very unlikely that the status quo will survive the experience of the pandemic.



Radical changes to the welfare system are historically associated with major crises and events such as wars, civil unrest, famines or epidemics. There is no reason that it will this time be any different, says a new paper from Dr Stephen Davies, Head of Education at the Institute of Economic Affairs.

Redefining the State of Welfare argues it is very probable that Coronavirus will bring to a head discontent with the existing system that has been growing for some time and will lay bare its weaknesses, particularly that of its central element: Universal Credit.

As such, a major public debate or conversation over our welfare state is imminent and inevitable. One idea bound to garner support – and which has a “head start” – is a Guaranteed Minimum Income (GMI) and, in particular, one version of that: a Universal Basic Income (UBI).

Advocates have seen this crisis as an opportunity to push the idea, while those previously sceptical on practical or cost grounds are now entertaining it. Many see the furlough scheme, though designed to preserve the supply side of the economy, as an illustration of the state’s responsibility to support incomes in a universal way.

Indeed, Coronavirus has opened the way for thinking about a radical change. While some simply argue for an extraordinary and temporary response to this emergency, it is very unlikely that once the crisis has passed things will go back to where they were.

If something can be implemented in a crisis, then that demonstrates its feasibility. Critics of a UBI, the paper says, will need to have a different alternative in mind to the regime that is currently being subjected to a severe stress test. The current pandemic was a crisis foretold: we cannot – and should not – think of this as a once in a century event.

That said, UBI also attracts widespread opposition and introducing a universal payment as an emergency measure is challenging because the UK government doesn’t currently have a list of all legal residents in the country.

Redefining the State of Welfare outlines two possible partial measures that could be introduced, that would be followed by a “recovery basic income” in which more substantive reforms would be made as part of a process of recovering from the pandemic and which would start the process of moving the system towards a GMI.

The main alternative, as outlined in the briefing, is that of Universal Basic Services: the state owns productive assets and uses them to provide a range of essential services either free of charge to the end user or for a flat rate and nominal fee (designed to regulate demand rather than fund the service). Many free-market liberals sceptical of a UBI are even more alarmed by the idea of UBS, on civil liberties grounds.

Moving to a UBI is not simply a matter of practicalities such as cost. It also raises fundamental questions about the way we live, how we as a society see ourselves, our institutions, and the relations between us – which again cut across conventional ideological divides.

The Coronavirus crisis therefore will almost certainly trigger a debate that will have an uncertain outcome. What seems very unlikely is that the status quo will survive the experience of the pandemic.

Dr Stephen Davies, Head of Education at the Institute of Economic Affairs and author of Redefining the State of Welfare, says: 


“The Coronavirus epidemic will provoke a debate over the UK’s welfare system and how to change it in response to the way the pandemic has shown up many of its weaknesses. There will be several options proposed and classical liberals need to participate in this debate and to help it address fundamental questions such as the place of work and the best way to support individual autonomy.” 

ENDS


Notes to editors

For media enquiries please contact Emily Carver, Media Manager: 07715 942731.

Redefining the State of Welfare will be published on Tuesday 26th May. A link to the embargoed report can be found here.

For further IEA reading on a Universal Basic Income:

Universal Basic Income: Is it a good idea?


The case against a Universal Basic Income (UBI)


Debate: Should we support a Universal Basic Income?

The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems.

The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.

SIGN UP FOR IEA EMAILS

Share this Story

previousPress ReleaseGovernment needs to wean the UK off this extraordinary level of state subsidy as soon as possible, says IEA expert22 May 2020
nextCoronavirusIEA expert comments on launch of test and trace system28 May 2020
latestLifestyle EconomicsOffering families food parcels instead of cash "reeks of paternalism"14 January 2021
previous
Press Release

Government needs to wean the UK off this extraordinary level of state subsidy as soon as possible, says IEA expert

26 May 2020
next
Coronavirus

IEA expert comments on launch of test and trace system

From a civil liberties perspective we are "not out of the woods," says Victoria Hewson

26 May 2020
latest
Lifestyle Economics

Offering families food parcels instead of cash "reeks of paternalism"

Annabel Denham writes for CapX

26 May 2020
Institute of Economic Affairs
BE PART OF THE IEA TODAY
  • Donate
  • Like
  • Follow
  • Watch

NEWSLETTER SIGN UP

Privacy Policy
© Institute of Economic Affairs
REGISTERED IN ENGLAND 755502, CHARITY NO. CC/235 351, LIMITED BY GUARANTEE
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Advertisement

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.

Performance

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

Analytics

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Functional

Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.

Uncategorized

Undefined cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.

Save & Accept
×