Strip back the Equality Act to better protect genuinely disadvantaged, says new IEA Report
10 February 2025
SUGGESTED
Economics
Media
10 February 2025
Lifestyle Economics
17 March 2025
#
Britain’s approach to tackling discrimination needs fundamental reform, according to a new Discussion Paper published by the Institute of Economic Affairs.
In ‘Liberalising Discrimination Law’ Daniel Freeman and Alex Morton argue that the UK’s approach to tackling discrimination must be restricted to outlawing direct discrimination, rather than attempting to equalise outcomes between different groups.
This would require stripping back the Equality Act to:
By stripping back these features of the Equality Act, Morton and Freeman argue the state would treat people as individuals, rather than primarily as members of certain groups. The current approach does not support the genuinely disadvantaged and creates a two-tier society.
The paper traces how the UK’s intellectual approach to tackling discrimination has evolved through four distinct stages over the past seventy years – from non-intervention, to laws targeting direct discrimination, to measures addressing ‘systemic inequalities’ and ‘indirect discrimination’, and finally to policies aimed at achieving equal outcomes between groups.
The 2010 Equality Act consolidated previous legislation into a comprehensive framework addressing both direct and indirect discrimination and focuses on group outcomes.
Sections of the Equality Act that go beyond banning direct discrimination by allowing claims of indirect discrimination and promoting positive action, which encourages organisations to favour specific groups in hiring and promotion, should be repealed. These measures focus on engineering group outcomes rather than ensuring fairness for individuals.
This approach has had unintended consequences. It takes society away from focusing on individuals and into focusing on group identities, often creating a two-tier relationship where people are treated differently because of their identity. We should not treat people differently due to their sex, race or ethnicity but as equal citizens, the report argues.
Efforts to equalise outcomes at a group level often overlook individuals facing genuine disadvantage, such as coming from low-income backgrounds. It is deeply unfair to promote people who may be well off because they are from a particular group.
Freeman and Morton call for the Equality Act to be stripped back to focus solely on preventing direct discrimination against individuals, removing provisions around indirect discrimination and positive action. This would create a framework that protects individual rights and people from discrimination, rather than focusing on group outcomes, an illiberal approach that damages us all.
Alex Morton, former Director of Strategy at the Institute of Economic Affairs said:
“People should be treated as individuals in a liberal society. The Equality Act does not achieve this and instead in parts promotes group identities in a divisive way. It should be stripped back to only outlaw direct discrimination.”
Daniel Freeman, Managing Editor at the Institute of Economic Affairs said:
“Anti-discrimination law was initially intended to shield individuals from unfair acts of direct discrimination but over recent decades it has dramatically widened in scope and ambition. It can increasingly be used as a tool to engineer social outcomes in ways that are illiberal and at times discriminatory. If politicians wish to reverse this mission creep the Equality Act will need to be reformed.”
About the Authors
Daniel Freeman is the Managing Editor at the Institute of Economic Affairs. Prior to joining the IEA, he worked in education. He studied History at Oxford University.
Alex Morton was the IEA Director of Strategy from 2022–2023. He is currently Director of Strategy at the Centre for Policy Studies. He has also worked in the No10 Policy Unit, parliament and civil service.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems. The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
- Treating people differently based on characteristics beyond their control is illiberal, divisive, and fails to help those who are genuinely disadvantaged
- UK equality legislation has evolved beyond preventing direct discrimination to actively promoting different treatment based on group identities
- The Equality Act should be stripped back to focus solely on preventing direct discrimination, a new IEA report argues
Britain’s approach to tackling discrimination needs fundamental reform, according to a new Discussion Paper published by the Institute of Economic Affairs.
In ‘Liberalising Discrimination Law’ Daniel Freeman and Alex Morton argue that the UK’s approach to tackling discrimination must be restricted to outlawing direct discrimination, rather than attempting to equalise outcomes between different groups.
This would require stripping back the Equality Act to:
- Abolish the concept of indirect discrimination in UK law. Stop allowing for the use of ‘positive action’ in employment and promotion decisions.
- Stop outlawing different pay for different work deemed as ‘equal value’ by the courts.
- Repeal the Public Sector Equality Duty. The Act states that public sector bodies must have “due regard to the need to… advance equality of opportunity between persons who share relevant protected characteristic and persons who do not”. It also requires a corporate body to encourage participation in public life by a person from a minority in which participation is low.
By stripping back these features of the Equality Act, Morton and Freeman argue the state would treat people as individuals, rather than primarily as members of certain groups. The current approach does not support the genuinely disadvantaged and creates a two-tier society.
The paper traces how the UK’s intellectual approach to tackling discrimination has evolved through four distinct stages over the past seventy years – from non-intervention, to laws targeting direct discrimination, to measures addressing ‘systemic inequalities’ and ‘indirect discrimination’, and finally to policies aimed at achieving equal outcomes between groups.
The 2010 Equality Act consolidated previous legislation into a comprehensive framework addressing both direct and indirect discrimination and focuses on group outcomes.
Sections of the Equality Act that go beyond banning direct discrimination by allowing claims of indirect discrimination and promoting positive action, which encourages organisations to favour specific groups in hiring and promotion, should be repealed. These measures focus on engineering group outcomes rather than ensuring fairness for individuals.
This approach has had unintended consequences. It takes society away from focusing on individuals and into focusing on group identities, often creating a two-tier relationship where people are treated differently because of their identity. We should not treat people differently due to their sex, race or ethnicity but as equal citizens, the report argues.
Efforts to equalise outcomes at a group level often overlook individuals facing genuine disadvantage, such as coming from low-income backgrounds. It is deeply unfair to promote people who may be well off because they are from a particular group.
Freeman and Morton call for the Equality Act to be stripped back to focus solely on preventing direct discrimination against individuals, removing provisions around indirect discrimination and positive action. This would create a framework that protects individual rights and people from discrimination, rather than focusing on group outcomes, an illiberal approach that damages us all.
Alex Morton, former Director of Strategy at the Institute of Economic Affairs said:
“People should be treated as individuals in a liberal society. The Equality Act does not achieve this and instead in parts promotes group identities in a divisive way. It should be stripped back to only outlaw direct discrimination.”
Daniel Freeman, Managing Editor at the Institute of Economic Affairs said:
“Anti-discrimination law was initially intended to shield individuals from unfair acts of direct discrimination but over recent decades it has dramatically widened in scope and ambition. It can increasingly be used as a tool to engineer social outcomes in ways that are illiberal and at times discriminatory. If politicians wish to reverse this mission creep the Equality Act will need to be reformed.”
About the Authors
Daniel Freeman is the Managing Editor at the Institute of Economic Affairs. Prior to joining the IEA, he worked in education. He studied History at Oxford University.
Alex Morton was the IEA Director of Strategy from 2022–2023. He is currently Director of Strategy at the Centre for Policy Studies. He has also worked in the No10 Policy Unit, parliament and civil service.
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems. The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.
SHARE
