Skip to content
Institute of Economic Affairs

Institute of Economic Affairs

Institute of Economic Affairs

Thursday May 19, 2022
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • rss
  • Institute of Economic Affairs
  • Home
  • About
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Epicenter
  • Contact Us
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • rss
  • Blog
  • Film
  • Coronavirus
  • Research
    • Publications
    • Economic Affairs
    • EA Magazine
    • Brexit Unit
    • Int. Trade & Competition Unit
    • SMPC
    • Paragon Initiative
  • Media
    • Media Coverage
    • Press Releases
    • Media Enquiries
    • About IEA Comms
  • Students
    • Internships
    • Events and Conferences
    • Essay Competition
    • Student Resources
    • IEA Budget Challenge
    • Economics101
  • Events
    • Forthcoming Events
    • Past Events
  • Donate
    • Donate Now
    • Donate Monthly
    • IEA Patreon
    • Other Ways to Donate
    • Legacy Gift
    • Donate from USA
    • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Epicenter
  • Contact Us

Online Safety Bill needs independent scrutiny to protect free speech, warns new paper

2 February 2022
Institute of Economic Affairs > Media posts > Media > Press Release
Independent Reviewer needed to prevent government censorship of online speech, argues new IEA paper


  • The draft Online Safety Bill presents a significant threat to freedom of speech, privacy and innovation.


  • The Bill’s inclusion of ‘legal but harmful speech’ risks state-mandated automated censorship of lawful online speech.


  • The draft legislation hands extraordinary discretion to the Secretary of State and Ofcom to design ‘codes of conduct’ that will define what content is deemed ‘legal but harmful’.


  • If the government is unwilling to fundamentally rewrite the Bill, there is a clear need for serious, independent scrutiny mechanisms to prevent regulatory and ministerial overreach.


  • An Independent Reviewer of Online Safety Legislation, modelled partly on the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism legislation, could stand up for freedom of expression, privacy and innovation, and act as a bulwark against future authoritarian demands.

    A new report, In Harm’s Way: Why online safety legislation needs an Independent Reviewer, published by the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), argues that the draft Online Safety Bill prioritises vague notions of ‘safety’ over freedom, privacy and innovation – and would in practice require censorship of online speech that would be lawful offline.


The inclusion of ‘legal but harmful’ speech in the Bill – along with defining unlawful speech as any content that the platform merely has ‘reasonable grounds to believe’ is unlawful – could lead to a draconian clamp down on speech online. Further, the duties to ‘have regard’ to freedom of expression and privacy are far weaker than the ‘safety’ duties.

The draft legislation also threatens innovation and competition within the UK digital economy. It imposes byzantine duties that will inevitably be harder and more costly for startups and smaller companies to comply with. This risks discouraging companies from operating in the UK, which could limit access to online services.

Authors Matthew Lesh and Mikolaj Barczentewicz highlight the extraordinary discretion the Bill hands to the Secretary of State and Ofcom to design ‘codes of conduct’ that will define ‘legal but harmful content’. This includes the power to impose additional requirements such as age verification and undermine end-end encryption. The regulator will also have significant leeway to discriminate when it comes to types of content and which platforms it targets.

If the Bill cannot be scrapped altogether, the authors propose several institutional safeguards that could be included in the legislation. Specifically, the paper makes the case for the creation of a new position of the Independent Reviewer of Online Safety Legislation, modelled partly on the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation. If properly empowered and resourced, it could stand up for freedom of expression, privacy and innovation while acting as a bulwark against future authoritarian demands.

The report suggests additional changes that policymakers could make to improve the Bill, including to:

  • Remove ‘legal but harmful’ content from the scope of content included in the Online Safety Bill, and if not, narrowly define ‘harm’ in primary legislation.

  • Mandate Ofcom to protect freedom expression in their activities and provide independent appeal mechanisms against the regulator’s actions.


  • Remove private messaging or age verification from scope of legislation.

    Matthew Lesh, report author and Head of Public Policy at the Institute of Economic Affairs, said:


‘The draft Online Safety Bill represents a drastic threat to freedom of expression. It will force companies to censor legal speech while placing extraordinary regulatory burdens on thousands of startups. Worryingly, ministers and Ofcom will have unprecedented powers to decide what we are allowed to see online.

‘If the government is unwilling to abandon the draconian proposals, the least they can do is ensure proper scrutiny and oversight. An independent reviewer – inspired by Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation – could provide an important bulwark against regulatory overreach.’

Mikołaj Barczentewicz, report author and Senior Lecturer in Law and Research Director of the Law and Technology Hub at the University of Surrey, said:

“There is a need for effective and independent oversight of the new online safety regime, because of the very real risks it poses to the freedom of speech and to innovation.

We argue that the new office of the Independent Reviewer of Online Safety Legislation will perform that job far more effectively than a parliamentary committee.”

Toby Young, General Secretary of the Free Speech Union, said:

“The Online Safety Bill poses a grave threat to free speech and is in urgent need of revision. The IEA is right to call for a strengthening of free speech protections – an independent reviewer would help defend against state censorship.”


Jim Killock, Executive Director of the Open Rights Group, said:

“The Online Safety Bill is a fundamentally flawed approach to regulating online content. This is a reasonable attempt to apply increased scrutiny to deal with the consequences of a bad bill, but the best way forward would be a complete rethink.”

SIGN UP FOR IEA EMAILS

Share this Story

previousPress ReleaseGovernment risks "cancelling out any benefits" of repealing EU law, warns regulatory expert31 January 2022
nextPress ReleaseAn energy bill rebate could easily backfire, says IEA economist2 February 2022
latestMedia CoverageNorthern Ireland Protocol is "failing", warns IEA researcher19 May 2022
previous
Press Release

Government risks "cancelling out any benefits" of repealing EU law, warns regulatory expert

2 February 2022
next
Press Release

An energy bill rebate could easily backfire, says IEA economist

2 February 2022
latest
Media Coverage

Northern Ireland Protocol is "failing", warns IEA researcher

Victoria Hewson comments for The Express

2 February 2022
Institute of Economic Affairs
BE PART OF THE IEA TODAY
  • Donate
  • Like
  • Follow
  • Watch

NEWSLETTER SIGN UP

Privacy Policy
© Institute of Economic Affairs
REGISTERED IN ENGLAND 755502, CHARITY NO. CC/235 351, LIMITED BY GUARANTEE
×
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Advertisement

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.

Performance

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

Analytics

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Functional

Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.

Uncategorized

Undefined cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.

Save & Accept
Powered by CookieYes