Civil liberties concerns persist after “widely predicted” move to private sector tracing system
Professor Philip Booth writes for Conservative Home
“The abandonment of the NHSX’s attempt to create a bespoke system for digital contact tracing in favour of a private sector solution had been widely predicted.
“The NHS app was beset with technical and legal difficulties from the beginning, whereas Apple and Google have a track record of producing trusted solutions at scale around the world, which health authorities will be able to leverage.
“In fairness, some of the things that the NHSX team were trying to do were understandable, such as allowing people to self-report symptoms rather than wait for an official test, and obtaining richer data for health authorities and researchers to work with.
“Of course, the latter was also a source of privacy and civil liberties concerns. While the Apple/Google solution entails less central sharing of data, those civil liberties concerns persist, especially around how it might be used.
“For example: will people eventually be expected to show their disease status on the app before being allowed into public spaces or workplaces, leading to the kind of digital ID envisaged by its long-term advocates?
“Will authorities seek to enforce isolation of people who receive a contact notification? There are still many issues with digital contact tracing that need to be understood before a critical mass of people will feel comfortable signing up to it.”
For media enquiries, contact Annabel Denham, 07540770774
For further reading:
Corona trade-offs: some issues with “test, test, test” and “track and trace”
The mission of the Institute of Economic Affairs is to improve understanding of the fundamental institutions of a free society by analysing and expounding the role of markets in solving economic and social problems. The IEA is a registered educational charity and independent of all political parties.