Euros
Recent unrest in Latvia and Bulgaria has emphasised the economic difficulties faced by the formerly communist countries in central and eastern Europe. Indeed a new IEA study, New Europe’s Old Regions, reveals that some regions of the European Union are now poorer than parts of sub-Saharan Africa. For example, GDP per head in Botswana is higher than in large parts of Poland, Romania and Bulgaria.

“New Europe’s Old Regions” are those areas of the EU that are very poor, have high levels of unemployment, low productivity and are dominated by agriculture and/or manufacturing industries.

Yet conventional regional policies, such as those that have failed in the former East Germany, cannot bring prosperity. Attempts to “pick winners” or subsidise industries in which a region does not have a comparative advantage have only exacerbated existing problems by misallocating economic resources.

Instead, governments should focus on liberalisation, particularly within labour markets. Politically, this could be achieved through the devolution of power, which would enable regional governments to reduce impediments to employment by, for example, adjusting minimum wages, benefit rates and regulations to suit local conditions. The EU should therefore decentralise and allow countries to opt out of new legislation and regulations. The policy needs of different parts of the EU vary so greatly that a “one size fits all” approach is not realistic.

Richard-Wellings-2012b.JPG

Director

Richard Wellings was educated at Oxford and the London School of Economics, completing a PhD on transport and environmental policy at the latter in 2004. He joined the Institute in 2006 as Deputy Editorial Director. Richard is the author, co-author or editor of several papers, books and reports, including Towards Better Transport (Policy Exchange, 2008), A Beginner’s Guide to Liberty (Adam Smith Institute, 2009), High Speed 2: The Next Government Project Disaster? (IEA , 2011) and Which Road Ahead - Government or Market? (IEA, 2012). He is a Senior Fellow of the Cobden Centre and the Economic Policy Centre.

2 thoughts on “Testing times for “New Europe””

  1. Posted 06/02/2009 at 08:05 | Permalink

    “The policy needs of different parts of the EU vary so greatly that a “one size fits all” approach is not realistic”. This is true and known by experts in the EU if to look back for the EU development. Regional funds is a mean to allocate funds from better developed states to less ones. Spain, for instance, had been receiving such support for decades. As an option, one may establish regional funds divison to develop new incomers: with more funds to be spent on them, while I am not sure if the “developed” EU’s population will like this. Measures proposed are also right: liberalization which may cause uncompetitiveness of their local economies and entities. So it has be sensibly weighed policy.

  2. Posted 06/02/2009 at 08:05 | Permalink

    “The policy needs of different parts of the EU vary so greatly that a “one size fits all” approach is not realistic”. This is true and known by experts in the EU if to look back for the EU development. Regional funds is a mean to allocate funds from better developed states to less ones. Spain, for instance, had been receiving such support for decades. As an option, one may establish regional funds divison to develop new incomers: with more funds to be spent on them, while I am not sure if the “developed” EU’s population will like this. Measures proposed are also right: liberalization which may cause uncompetitiveness of their local economies and entities. So it has be sensibly weighed policy.

Comments are closed.